One Billion People More Resilient
Presenter at Santiago announcement
Search and filter policy solutions using the Heat Action Policy Tool.
Policy Solution

Chief Heat Officers

Lead by Example

Case Studies

Summary

One of the challenges of protecting people from heat is that the responsibility for heat-related issues is spread across many agencies and positions. A Chief Heat Officer can serve as a unifying leader for this work, responsible for addressing rising temperatures through short- and long-term interventions and raising awareness about heat risks.

Implementation

Appoint, fund, and recruit a Chief Heat Officer and supporting positions as needed.

Considerations for Use

Ensure the Chief Heat Officers are supported within their government functions and have both jurisdiction and funding to implement meaningful solutions.

Overview

  • Climate:

    Cold, Hot/Dry, Hot/Humid, Temperate

  • Policy Levers:

    Lead by ExampleGovernments have ownership and jurisdiction over a range of assets (e.g. buildings and streets) and also serve as a direct employer, and contractor. This allows them to promote heat risk reduction and preparedness solutions and demonstrate their impact through leading by example with proactive interventions to make their assets, employment opportunities, and contracts heat-resilient.

  • Trigger Points:

    No-regrets actions (low cost/low effort but substantial benefit)Interventions that are relatively low-cost and low effort (in terms of requisite dependencies) but have substantial environmental and/or social benefits.
    Preparatory measures (actions to establish authority to act)Actions to establish/ensure the authority to act when appropriate trigger-points occur.

  • Intervention Types:

    Planning/Policy

  • Sectors:

    City Administration

Case Studies

Impact

  • Target Beneficiaries:

    Heat-vulnerable communities, Residents

  • Phase of Impact:

    Risk reduction and mitigation

  • Metrics:

    Number of projects initiated or completed

Implementation

  • Intervention Scale:

    City

  • Authority and Governance:

    City government

  • Implementation Timeline:

    Short-term (1-2 Years)

  • Implementation Stakeholders:

    City government

  • Funding Sources:

    Grants and philanthropy, Public investment

  • Capacity to Act:

    High, Medium

Benefits

  • Cost-Benefit:

    Medium

  • Public Good:

    Medium

  • GHG Reduction:

    N/A

  • Co-benefits (Climate/Environmental):

    N/A

  • Co-benefits (Social/Economic):

    Build community capacity